When the Seattle Kraken hired Dan Bylsma as their head coach, it marked a turning point for the franchise. After three seasons under Dave Hakstol, the team decided to bring in someone with championship experience. Bylsma’s Stanley Cup victory with the Pittsburgh Penguins in 2009 and a history of success behind the bench made him an attractive candidate. But as the Kraken continue to navigate their fourth season in the NHL, fans are left wondering: is Bylsma the right fit for the team’s long-term goals?
Tactical adjustments and identity building
One of Bylsma’s immediate challenges was to instill a stronger team identity. Known for his structured systems and emphasis on responsible two-way play, he’s brought some much-needed discipline to the Kraken’s approach. The defense has been more organized, especially with the return of Vince Dunn, and the goaltending tandem led by Joey Daccord has flourished under Bylsma’s watch.
However, questions remain about the team’s offensive inconsistency. The Kraken often struggle to generate high-danger scoring chances, and their reliance on individual efforts rather than cohesive puck movement has been a sticking point. While the power play has shown recent signs of life, it’s unclear whether these improvements are sustainable or simply a flash in the pan.
Player development under Bylsma
A critical component of Bylsma’s tenure will be how he handles the development of young players like Shane Wright, Ryker Evans, and Matty Beniers. Shane Wright had a rough start to the season, and his usage sparked debate as his minutes dropped and he was benched for three straight games. However, since returning to the lineup, Wright’s play has been among the team’s best, showcasing a vote of confidence that Bylsma’s approach worked. On the other hand, Evans has taken significant strides this season, a testament to the coaching staff’s ability to nurture emerging talent.
Leadership and locker room dynamics
Bylsma’s experience brings credibility to the locker room, but his history isn’t without its challenges. In Pittsburgh, his relationships with star players reportedly soured toward the end of his tenure. While the Kraken don’t have the same superstar dynamics, managing egos and maintaining a strong team culture are just as critical for a young franchise trying to establish itself.
Early indications suggest that Bylsma has struck a good balance. Veteran players like Jared McCann and Brandon Tanev have praised his communication and preparation. Still, his ability to foster long-term cohesion will be a key factor in determining his success.
Can Bylsma build a contender?
The ultimate question is whether Bylsma can elevate the Kraken from a middle-of-the-pack team to a legitimate Stanley Cup contender. His track record suggests he’s capable, but the NHL landscape has changed significantly since his championship run. Today’s game demands adaptability and creativity, especially when managing rosters that lack star power.
Bylsma’s strengths—defensive structure, special teams improvement, and player accountability—are valuable building blocks. However, the Kraken’s front office must complement his coaching style by providing the roster upgrades needed to compete with elite teams. Without those pieces, even the best systems can only take a team so far.
Final verdict
Dan Bylsma’s early tenure with the Kraken has shown promise, but it’s too soon to declare him the definitive long-term solution. His experience and tactical acumen have helped stabilize the team, but questions about offensive creativity and player development loom large. As the Kraken’s roster evolves, so too must Bylsma’s approach. If he can adapt to the modern NHL’s demands and continue fostering growth within the team, he could very well be the coach who leads Seattle to sustained success.